How to Be an (A)theist: Why Many Skeptics Aren't Skeptical Enough Read Online Free - Atheists talk a lot about the importance of skepticism. But the truth is, they're not nearly skeptical enough.
While they champion the importance of a critical stance toward religion, they often fail to take that same stance toward their own beliefs. This double standard results in grandiose claims about the certainty of unbelief. However, their confidence in the rational strength of their own position is logically inconsistent at best and intellectually dishonest at worst. Turning atheists' skepticism around on their own naturalist worldview, philosopher Mitch Stokes critically examines two things that such skeptics hold dear—science and morality—revealing deep inconsistencies among atheists' most cherished beliefs, inconsistencies that threaten to undo atheism itself.
|Title||:||How to Be an (A)theist: Why Many Skeptics Aren't Skeptical Enough|
|Number of Pages||:||256 pages|
February 25, 2016
Mitch's goal in this book is to show Atheists, sceptics are not consistent or skeptical enough, I think he has given a good base for it.
Personally, I think Atheists are good people, some are really loving but I am not interested in that, but more on the system of beliefs when challenged.
If you a...
November 28, 2017
Stokes argues in this book, not "how to be an atheist" but how to be a consistent atheist. He argues that atheists don't follow their presuppositions to their logical conclusions--namely, they are not skeptical enough about the ability of science to answer the questions they ask of it. Not only t...
January 02, 2017
This book requires thinking work, but is unrelenting to the point and interspersed with Calvin and Hobbes cartoons. I enjoyed thinking about brains in vats and how philosophy is inescapable to science, and more science-people should acknowledge it.
May 13, 2017
This book had so much promise, but in the end it was only OK.
The author addresses two hot button issues in Christian apologetics (science and morality). He strikes me as a sophisticated philosopher (good), and he tries to simplify his arguments so that any layperson can understand them (good). Ho...
January 31, 2018
This dude loves Hume and bases his entire argument for skepticism off of that “philosophy.” Not only was it boring but the irony of saying “Humes’s philosophy is the only scientific ‘process’ that holds any water” is obviously lost on this guy. I almost threw this book in frustration because of t...
January 27, 2018
Good for the hardcore atheists . . .
October 04, 2017
An excellent book. Objectively.
February 28, 2017
Good book for the topic it covers. Not an all-encompassing apologetic but it does handle very well the topic it addresses: the hypocrisy of modern skepticism and the failure of naturalists to follow their logic through fully. He addresses how skeptics have chosen to be skeptical over the areas th...
February 23, 2016
The title of this book is not very helpful, but the subtitle does a good job of getting at the book's theme. The text is more or less divided into half. The first half addresses cosmology and other aspects of physics, questioning whether advances in these fields have truly precluded theism, as ma...
February 20, 2016
How to Be an Atheist challenges readers to come to terms with the ramifications of new atheism beliefs. Exposing the silliness of scientists arguing that philosophy serves no purpose while engage in writing philosophic tomes. Not seeing the elephant in the room that a lifeless universe's cannot d...